Working Papers in Economics,
University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics

Abstract: In his seminal 1970 book, The Gift Relationship, Richard Titmuss argued that monetary compensation for donating blood might crowd out the supply of blood donors. To test this claim we carry out a field experiment with three different treatments. In the first treatment subjects are given the opportunity to become blood donors without any compensation. In the second treatment subjects receive a payment of SEK 50 (approx. $7) for becoming blood donors, and in the third treatment subjects can choose between a SEK 50 payment and donating SEK 50 to charity. The results differ markedly between men and women. For men the supply of blood donors is not significantly different among the three experimental groups. For women there is a significant crowding out effect. The supply of blood donors decreases by almost half when a monetary payment is introduced. There is also a significant effect of allowing individuals to donate the payment to charity, and this effect fully counteracts the crowding out effect.

Keywords: Crowding out; monetary incentives; field experiments; altruism

JEL-codes: C93; D64; I18; Z13

35 pages, First version: October 6, 2005. Revised: February 8, 2008.

Full text files

2741 HTML file 

Download statistics

Fortchoming as

Carl Mellström and Magnus Johannesson, 'Crowding Out in Blood Donation: Was Titmuss Right?', Journal of the European Economic Association

• University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics
• Ordering Working Papers
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Jessica Oscarsson ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0180This page generated on 2024-11-14 18:33:26.