Simon A. Mason () and Adrian Muller ()
Additional contact information
Simon A. Mason: Center for Security Studies (CSS), Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology, ETH Zentrum, Postal: Zürich, WEC
Adrian Muller: Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law, Göteborg University, Postal: Box 640, SE 405 30 GÖTEBORG
Abstract: Complementing market-based policy instruments with conflict analysis approaches provides a wider understanding of market situations and allows to identify minimal requirements regarding needs, power and conflict dynamics. If these are not met, a market cannot be successfully introduced or a liberalization process implemented. Conflict analysis offers a language better suited to the concerns of people negatively affected by new markets. Applying this language helps to counterbalance the predominance of economic concepts. This fosters mutual understanding and enhances the prospect for successful implementation of market-based policies. We illustrate the potential of conflict analysis with examples from water privatization and labeling.
Keywords: market interactions; liberalization; privatization; labeling; conflict analysis; needs
JEL-codes: D02; D74; H00; L13; L43; L50
18 pages, August 31, 2006
Full text files
2703 HTML file
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Jessica Oscarsson ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0212This page generated on 2024-10-31 13:22:58.