SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance
Is the Law of Reflux Valid?
Abstract: In the classical monetary debates, the Banking School held
that notes would be equally demand-elastic whether supplied by many or a
single issuer. The Free Banking School held that notes would be less
demand-elastic if supplied by a single issuer. These assertions have
rarely, if ever, been subject to more stringent statistical testing. In
this paper I compare the elastic properties of the note stock of the
Swedish note banking system in 1880–1895 with those of the regime in
1904–1913, when the Bank of Sweden held a note monopoly. Evidence suggests
that notes did not become less elastic after monopolisation, thus lending
support to the views of the Banking School.
Keywords: Banking School; Free Banking School; Elastic currency; Clearing mechanism; Needs of trade; Law of Reflux; Real bills doctrine; (follow links to similar papers)
JEL-Codes: B12; E42; E51; E58; N13; N23; (follow links to similar papers)
24 pages, June 15, 2005
Before downloading any of the electronic versions below
you should read our statement on
for viewing Postscript files and the
Acrobat Reader for viewing and printing pdf files.
Full text versions of the paper:
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Helena Lundin ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ()
or Helena Lundin ().
Design by Joachim Ekebom