Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics
HomeAboutSeriesSubject/JEL codesAdvanced Search
The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance

No 599:
Is the Law of Reflux Valid?

Per Hortlund ()

Abstract: In the classical monetary debates, the Banking School held that notes would be equally demand-elastic whether supplied by many or a single issuer. The Free Banking School held that notes would be less demand-elastic if supplied by a single issuer. These assertions have rarely, if ever, been subject to more stringent statistical testing. In this paper I compare the elastic properties of the note stock of the Swedish note banking system in 1880–1895 with those of the regime in 1904–1913, when the Bank of Sweden held a note monopoly. Evidence suggests that notes did not become less elastic after monopolisation, thus lending support to the views of the Banking School.

Keywords: Banking School; Free Banking School; Elastic currency; Clearing mechanism; Needs of trade; Law of Reflux; Real bills doctrine; (follow links to similar papers)

JEL-Codes: B12; E42; E51; E58; N13; N23; (follow links to similar papers)

24 pages, June 15, 2005

Before downloading any of the electronic versions below you should read our statement on copyright.
Download GhostScript for viewing Postscript files and the Acrobat Reader for viewing and printing pdf files.

Full text versions of the paper:

hastef0599.pdf    PDF-file (292kB) 
Download Statistics

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Helena Lundin ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson () or Helena Lundin ().

Programing by
Design by Joachim Ekebom

Handle: RePEc:hhs:hastef:0599 This page was generated on 2014-12-14 19:23:07