Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics

Seminar Papers,
Stockholm University, Institute for International Economic Studies

No 686: Five Fallacies in the Social Security Debate

Mats Persson (mp@iies.su.se)
Additional contact information
Mats Persson: Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University, Postal: Stockholm University, S-106 69 Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract: This paper discusses five examples of the conventional wisdom that has often been expressed in the social security debate, even among academic economists. These are: 1. The major problem in most social security systems is that of demography: people simply live too long. 2. Disregarding the issue of demography, a Pay-As-You-Go system is inferior to a fully funded system since the former usually has a lower rate of return. 3. Disregarding the portfolio aspect (which might favor a PAYG system), a funded system dominates a PAYG system in a world of certainty. 4. The social security system is a suitable instrument for intergenerational risk sharing. 5. The government is a safe and reliable provider of insurance.

Keywords: Social security

JEL-codes: H55

24 pages, June 1, 2000

Full text files

FULLTEXT01 PDF-file 

Download statistics

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Hanna Christiansson (hanna.christiansson@iies.su.se)
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson (sune.karlsson@oru.se).

RePEc:hhs:iiessp:0686This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:15:25.