Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics
HomeAboutSeriesSubject/JEL codesAdvanced Search
Department of Economics, Karlstad University Karlstad University Working Papers in Economics

No 1:
A Comparison of Benefit Cost and Cost Utility Analysis in Practice: Divergent Policies in Sweden

Lars Hultkrantz () and Mikael Svensson ()

Abstract: We compare the implementation of Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) and Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA) as tools for making priorities in allocation of national public funds in the transport sector and health sector, respectively, in Sweden. While the principal distinctions between these methods are well known, less notice has been given to a number of other differences that have emerged as national and international practices have evolved over time along separate lines. We compare cost and benefit components and economic parameter values and find some surprising disparities. There are inconsistencies, both across methods and within each method. Both can be improved by learning from the other. We also find that some current practices conflict with the underlying welfare theory and/or insights from recent empirical analysis.

Keywords: Economic evaluation methods; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis; Guidelines; (follow links to similar papers)

JEL-Codes: D61; H51; I18; (follow links to similar papers)

34 pages, April 2, 2012

Before downloading any of the electronic versions below you should read our statement on copyright.
Download GhostScript for viewing Postscript files and the Acrobat Reader for viewing and printing pdf files.

Full text versions of the paper:

cba_vs_cua_swopec_pdf_15440.pdf    PDF-file
Download Statistics

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Mikael Svensson ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson () or Helena Lundin ().

Programing by
Design by Joachim Ekebom

Handle: RePEc:hhs:kaunek:0001 This page was generated on 2014-12-14 19:24:34