Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics
HomeAboutSeriesSubject/JEL codesAdvanced Search
Department of Economics, Lund University Working Papers, Department of Economics, Lund University

No 2016:14:
On Evaluating Author's Performance by Publications: An Axiomatic Study

Conan Mukherjee () and Aftab Alam

Abstract: Administrators in every academic institution across the world have to deal with the unenviable task of comparing researchers on the basis of their academic contributions. Unfortunately, however, there is no reasonably established consensus on the method of arriving at such comparisons, which typically involve trading off accomplishments in teaching, grant writing and academic publication. In this paper, we focus on the particular dimension of academic publication, and analyze this issue from a more fundamental perspective than addressed by the popular h-index (which may lead to unfair and counter-intuitive comparisons in certain situations). In particular, we undertake an axiomatic analysis of all possible ways to measure academic authorship for a given dataset of research articles and find that an egalitarian e-index is the only method which satisfies the axioms of anonymity, monotonicity, and efficiency. This index divides authorship of joint projects equally and sums across all publications of an author.

Keywords: e-index; h-index; Anonymity; Monotonicity; (follow links to similar papers)

JEL-Codes: A14; D70; I23; O30; (follow links to similar papers)

5 pages, June 27, 2016, Revised May 12, 2017

Download Statistics

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to David Edgerton ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson () or Helena Lundin ().

Programing by
Design by Joachim Ekebom

Handle: RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2016_014 This page was generated on 2017-07-20 13:51:15