S-WoPEc
 
Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics
HomeAboutSeriesSubject/JEL codesAdvanced Search
Ratioinstitutet - The Ratio Institute Ratio Working Papers

No 61:
Is the Law of Reflux Valid? Evidence from Sweden 18781913

Per Hortlund

Abstract: In the classical monetary debates, the Banking School held that notes would be equally demand-elastic whether supplied by many or a single issuer. The Free Banking School held that notes would be less demand-elastic if supplied by a single issuer. These assertions have rarely, if ever, been subject to more stringent statistical testing. In this paper I compare the elastic properties of the note stock of the Swed-ish note banking system in 18781901 with those of the regime in 19041914, when the Bank of Sweden held a note monopoly. Evi-dence suggests that notes did not become less elastic after monopoli-sation, thus lending support to the views of the Banking School.

Keywords: Banking School; Free Banking School; Elastic currency; Clearing mechanism; Note competition; Needs of trade; Law of Reflux; Speed of redemption; Real bills doctrine; (follow links to similar papers)

JEL-Codes: B12; E42; E51; E58; N13; N23; (follow links to similar papers)

22 pages, January 3, 2005

Before downloading any of the electronic versions below you should read our statement on copyright.
Download GhostScript for viewing Postscript files and the Acrobat Reader for viewing and printing pdf files.

Full text versions of the paper:

ph_reflux.pdf    PDF-file
Download Statistics
This paper is forthcoming as:
Hortlund, Per, 'Is the Law of Reflux Valid? Evidence from Sweden 18801913', Financial History Review.



Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Martin Korpi ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson () or Helena Lundin ().

Programing by
Design by Joachim Ekebom

Handle: RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0061 This page was generated on 2014-12-14 19:26:19