S-WoPEc
 
Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics
HomeAboutSeriesSubject/JEL codesAdvanced Search
Ratioinstitutet - The Ratio Institute Ratio Working Papers

No 118:
Choosing One’s Own Informal Institutions: On Hayek’s Critique of Keynes’s Immoralism

Niclas Berggren ()

Abstract: In the main, Hayek favored rules that apply equally to all and located such rules in tradition, beyond conscious construction. This led Hayek to attack Keynes’s immoralism, i.e. the position that one should be free to choose how to lead one’s life irrespective of the informal institutions in place. However, it is argued here that immoralism may be compatible with Hayek’s enterprise since Hayek misinterpreted Keynes, who did not advo-cate the dissolving of all informal rules for everybody. By avoiding this misinterpretation, immoralism can be seen as institutional experimentation at the margin, which Hayek himself favored.

Keywords: Institutions; rules; traditions; morality; liberty; rule of law; (follow links to similar papers)

JEL-Codes: B25; O17; P48; Z13; (follow links to similar papers)

26 pages, April 14, 2008

Before downloading any of the electronic versions below you should read our statement on copyright.
Download GhostScript for viewing Postscript files and the Acrobat Reader for viewing and printing pdf files.

Full text versions of the paper:

nb_informal.pdf    PDF-file
Download Statistics
This paper is published as:
Berggren, Niclas, (2009), 'Choosing One’s Own Informal Institutions: On Hayek’s Critique of Keynes’s Immoralism', Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 20, No. 2, pages 139-159



Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Martin Korpi ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson () or Helena Lundin ().

Programing by
Design by Joachim Ekebom

Handle: RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0118 This page was generated on 2014-12-14 19:26:22