UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance,
University of Stavanger

Abstract: There is a planning gap for CCS projects in Europe. CCS demonstration plants are not implemented as expected. This fact is at odds with optimistic valuation reports that apply socio-economic valuation criteria for climate projects. However, CCS plants are in most cases to be implemented by private companies. Economic valuation of climate projects, seen from the perspective of the commercial companies, is the subject of this article. We examine key economic parameters of 27 oil and gas projects and compare it to a CCS project. We find that the CCS project ranks the lowest on all profitability metrics, and is unlikely to be implemented by a private company. Our findings may explain why it is hard for oil companies to justify climate projects in their portfolios.

Keywords: Climate projects; decision analysis; CO2

JEL-codes: G31; G38; M21; Q48; Q51

16 pages, August 1, 2014

Full text files

uis_wps_2014_8_emhjellen_osmundsen.pdf  

Download statistics

• University of Stavanger
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Bernt Arne Odegaard ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

This page generated on 2024-02-05 17:13:43.