Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics

Umeå Economic Studies,
Umeå University, Department of Economics

No 729: Does physicians' compensation affect the probability of their vetoing generic substitution?

David Granlund ()
Additional contact information
David Granlund: Department of Economics, Umeå University, Postal: S 901 87 Umeå, Sweden

Abstract: Physicians' decisions whether or not to veto generic substitution were analyzed using a sample of 350,000 pharmaceutical prescriptions. Point estimates show that - compared to county-employed physicians on salary - physicians working at private practices were 50-80% more likely to veto substitution. The results indicate that this difference is explained by the difference in direct cost associated with substitution, rather than by private physicians' possibly stronger incentives to please their patients. Also, the probability of a veto was found to increase as patients' copayments decreased. This might indicate moral hazard in insurance, though other explanations are plausible.

Keywords: doctors; salary; fee for service; moral hazard; prescriptions; drugs

JEL-codes: D86; I11; L33

23 pages, First version: February 1, 2008. Revised: March 26, 2008.

Full text files

DownloadAsset.action...Id=3&assetKey=ues729 PDF-file 

Download statistics

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to David Skog ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

This page generated on 2024-02-05 17:13:51.