Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics

African Economic History Working Paper,
African Economic History Network

No 23/2015: IS AFRICA TOO LATE FOR ‘LATE DEVELOPMENT’? GERSCHENKRON SOUTH OF THE SAHARA

Gareth Austin ()
Additional contact information
Gareth Austin: The Graduate Institute of Geneva, Postal: Case postale 136, , 1211 Genève 21, Switzerland

Abstract: This essay presents an economic history perspective on prospects for industrialization in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Gerschenkron-Amsden ‘late development’/‘late industrialization’ approach has valuable insights for Africa, but is best set within Sugihara’s longer-term, non-Eurocentric framework of very long-term ‘paths’ of development, which respond to particular factor endowments with characteristic choices of technique and institution. Most of Africa has been labour-scarce until relatively recently, and accordingly showed a preference for land-extensive development, seeking to maximize returns to labour rather than land. The same resource conditions suggest that Africa was never likely to have moved directly from handicrafts to modern manufacturing without an intervening phase of specialization in primary products. But Africa’s resource ratios have changed radically in recent decades, towards labour abundance plus much greater human capital formation. This greatly increases the chance that industrialization, initially labour-intensive, can take off in at least some African economies, with state support.

Keywords: Sub-Saharan Africa; economic development; economic history; manufacturing

JEL-codes: N57; N67; O14; O25; O55

26 pages, October 30, 2015

Download statistics

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Erik Green ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

This page generated on 2018-01-23 23:30:51.