Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics

Working Papers in Economics,
University of Bergen, Department of Economics

No 08/03: Measuring Heterogeneity in the Returns to Education in Norway Using Educational Reforms

Arild Aakvik (), Kjell G. Salvanes () and Kjell Vaage ()
Additional contact information
Arild Aakvik: University of Bergen, Department of Economics, Postal: Hermann Fossgt. 6, N-5007 Bergen, Norway
Kjell G. Salvanes: NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Postal: Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway
Kjell Vaage: University of Bergen, Department of Economics, Postal: Hermann Fossgt. 6, N-5045 Bergen, Norway

Abstract: The decision to take more education is complex, and is influenced by individual ability, financial constraints, family background, preferences, etc. Such factors, normally unobserved by the researcher, introduce endogeneity and heterogeneity problems into estimating the returns to education. In this paper, these problems are addressed by estimating a comparative advantage model for schooling, in which the returns to education vary at different levels of education. The model requires that instruments must be specified at each level of education, and we suggest that different school reforms in Norway can serve as suitable instruments. In particular, we exploit the staged implementation of a major reform in the comprehensive school system in the 1960s. We find that the returns to education are strongly nonlinear. In particular, we find that the returns to upper secondary school and shorter programs at regional colleges, together with master’s programs at universities, have high returns as measured by wages. Also, we find that the average treatment effect is surprisingly high for medium-length educations (up to two years of college education). This means that increasing the general level of education, which was the intention of the comprehensive school reform of the 1960s and of other school reforms, has the potential to generate a high return in wages, although we do not consider the cost to society. We also find that there is a substantial difference between the average treatment effect and the effect of treatment on the treated for bachelor’s and master’s degrees at universities.

Keywords: Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models; Quantile Regressions; Social Interaction Models (Updated); Analysis of Education

JEL-codes: C31; I21

49 pages, June 17, 2003

Full text files

08-03.pdf PDF-file Full text

Download statistics

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Kjell Erik Lommerud ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

This page generated on 2024-02-05 17:10:55.