Working Papers in Economics,
University of Bergen, Department of Economics

Abstract: We study the competitive effects of restricting direct access to secondary care by gatekeeping, focusing on the informational role of gatekeeping general practitioners (GPs). We consider a secondary care market with two hospitals choosing the quality and specialisation of their care. GPs perfectly observe the diagnosis of a patient and the exact characteristics of the secondary care market. Patients are either informed or uninformed when accessing the hospital market. We consider two distinct cases: first, we let the fraction of informed patients be exogenous, implying that the regulator can only influence patients' decision of consulting a GP by making this compulsory ('direct gatekeeping'). Second, we endogenise this fraction by assuming GP consultation to be costly for the patient. Then the reulator can influence the GP attendance rate through the regulated price ('indirect gatekeeping'). A main finding of the paper is that strict gatekeeping may not be socially desirable, even if it is costless.

Keywords: Gatekeeping; Imperfect information; Quality competition; Product differentiation; Price regulation

JEL-codes: D82; I11; I18; L13

28 pages, July 4, 2003

Full text files

10-03.pdf  Full text

Download statistics

• University of Bergen, Department of Economics
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Kjell Erik Lommerud ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:bergec:2003_010This page generated on 2024-10-27 22:37:47.