David Blandford (), Rolf Jens Brunstad (), Ivar Gaasland () and Erling Vårdal ()
Additional contact information
David Blandford: The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, U.S.A., Postal: Office address: 112D Armsby Building, University Park, PA , U.S.
Rolf Jens Brunstad: The Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Postal: Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway
Ivar Gaasland: INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Postal: Breiviksveien 40, N-5045 Bergen, Norway
Erling Vårdal: University of Bergen, Department of Economics, Postal: Hermann Fossgt. 6, N-5007 Bergen, Norway
Abstract: The producer support estimate calculated by the OECD is widely misused as an indicator of distortions created by agricultural policies. In this paper we demonstrate rigorously that a change in the relative (percentage) PSE is not an accurate indicator of the implications of policy reform for domestic welfare or for trade distortions. If there are positive externalities linked to agricultural inputs (e.g., land), we demonstrate that replacing output subsidies by optimal Pigouvian subsidies may result in an increase or a reduction in relative PSE depending on the parameters of the production function. Using the example of Norway we show that an increase in the relative PSE is likely if the focus of agricultural policies shifts from income support to the provision of public goods.
Keywords: Agricultural policy; trade distortion; domestic support; producer support estimate PSE).
JEL-codes: C61; F13; F18; Q17; Q18
23 pages, August 23, 2008
Full text files
wp12-08.pdf Full text
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Kjell Erik Lommerud ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:bergec:2008_012This page generated on 2024-10-27 22:37:47.