Anders Molander () and Gaute Torsvik ()
Additional contact information
Anders Molander: Oslo and Akershus University College of applied Sciences, Postal: Oslo and Akershus University College, of Applied Sciences, Postboks 4 St. Olavs plass, NO-0130 Oslo, Norway
Gaute Torsvik: Department of Economics, University of Bergen, Postal: University of Bergen, Department of Economics , Postboks 7802 , Fosswinckelsgate 14, NO-5020 BERGEN
Abstract: So-called activation policies aiming at bringing jobless people into work have been a central component of welfare reforms across OECD countries during the last decades. Such policies combine restrictive and enabling programs, but their characteristic feature is that also enabling programs are mandatory, and non-compliers are sanctioned. There are four main arguments that can be used to defend mandatory activation of benefit recipients. We label them efficiency, sustainability, paternalism, and justice. Each argument is analyzed in turn and according to a strict scheme. First we clarify which standards it invokes. Thereafter we evaluate each argument according to its own standards Finally we introduce competing normative concerns that have to be taken into account. In the conclusion we discuss possible constellations of arguments that make up the normative space for activation policies.
Keywords: work-welfare; social transfers; labour productivity; screening
37 pages, June 12, 2013
Full text files
w.p3.13.pdf Full text
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Kjell Erik Lommerud ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:bergec:2013_003This page generated on 2024-10-27 22:37:47.