Heike Auerswald (), Carsten Schmidt (), Marcel Thum () and Gaute Torsvik ()
Additional contact information
Heike Auerswald: Faculty of Business and Economics, Technical University Dresden
Carsten Schmidt: University of Mannheim
Marcel Thum: Faculty of Business and Economics, Technical University Dresden,
Gaute Torsvik: University of Bergen
Abstract: Many decisions in politics and business are made by teams rather than by single individuals. In contrast, economic models typically assume an individual rational decision maker. A rapidly growing body of (experimental) literature investigates team decisions in different settings. We study team decisions in a public goods contribution game with a costly punishment option and compare it to the behavior of individuals in a laboratory experiment. We also consider different team decision-making rules (unanimity, majority). We find that teams contribute significantly more and punish less than individuals, regardless of the team decision rule. Overall, teams yield higher payoffs than individuals.
Keywords: Group Decision Making; Public Good; Experiment; Punishment
21 pages, October 18, 2013
Full text files
08-2013_Heike%20Auer...%20punish%20less.pdf Full text
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Kjell Erik Lommerud ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:bergec:2013_008This page generated on 2024-10-27 22:37:47.