Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics

Discussion Papers,
Statistics Norway, Research Department

No 366: PPP-correction of the IPCC emission scenarios - does it matter?

Bjart J. Holtsmark () and Knut H. Alfsen
Additional contact information
Knut H. Alfsen: Statistics Norway

Abstract: Ian Castles and David Henderson have criticized IPCC's Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) (IPCC, 2000) for using market exchange rates (MER) instead of purchasing power parities (PPP) when converting regional GDP into a common denominator. The consequence is that poor countries generally appear to be poorer than they actually are. An overstated income gap between rich and poor countries in the base year gives rise to projections of too high economic growth in the poor countries because the scenarios are constructed with the aim of reducing the income gap. Castles and Henderson claim that overstated economic growth means that greenhouse gas emissions are overstated as well. However, because closure of the emission intensity gap between the rich and the poor parts of the world is another important driving force in the scenarios, we argue that the use of MER in the SRES scenarios has not caused an overestimation of the global emission growth because the two types of errors effectively neutralize one another.

Keywords: Global warming; Emission scenarios; IPCC; PPP.

JEL-codes: Q30; Q41 February 2004

Full text files

dp366.pdf PDF-file 

Download statistics

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to L Maasø ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:ssb:dispap:366This page generated on 2024-10-30 04:36:21.