Iulie Aslaksen and Terje Synnestvedt ()
Additional contact information
Terje Synnestvedt: Statistics Norway
Abstract: The relationship between the concept of option value in the literature on environmental preservation and the financial theory of option value is discussed by Fisher (2000), suggesting an equivalence between the two concepts. In a recent paper, Mensink and Requate (2004) argue that Fisher's claim is incorrect. In this paper we clarify Fisher's argument by drawing on the article by Hanemann (1989), whereby we find the conditions for the Arrow-Fisher-Henry-Hanemann (AFHH) and the Dixit-Pindyck (DP) option value concepts to coincide or not. The main point is that the AFHH option value is derived under the assumption that investment does not take place in the first period, neither in the closed-loop nor in the open-loop strategy, whereas the analysis of the DP option value is based on the assumption that investment in the open-loop strategy takes place in the first period.
Keywords: Option value; Uncertainty; Information; Irreversibility; Environment
JEL-codes: D81; Q20 September 2004
Full text files
dp390.pdf
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to L Maasø ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:ssb:dispap:390This page generated on 2024-10-30 04:36:21.