EfD Discussion Paper,
Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg

Abstract: Open access post-harvest grazing is widespread in mixed crop-livestock systems. This discourages conservation agriculture, which depends on keeping the soil surface covered with crop residues. One way to reduce open access grazing is through restricting communal grazing access to allow rights of exclusion, while simultaneously improving the production of livestock feeds. This paper analyzes farmers’ perceptions about postharvest free grazing on agricultural lands and identifies incentives that motivate forage production, to help inform forage development and policy. We collected data from randomly selected farm households in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia and used a choice experiment method. We found that a majority of farmers would prefer post-harvest grazing restrictions to the existing reciprocal post-harvest grazing. Farmers also had strong preferences for forage production policy incentives, but the results reveal considerable preference heterogeneity. The study provides policy makers with needed information for formulating multiple policy incentives for smallholder forage production systems, with possible implications for other areas with mixed farming systems.

Keywords: Post-harvest grazing; forage; open access; conservation agriculture; choice experiment; Ethiopia

JEL-codes: C35; Q12

Language: English

27 pages, June 1, 2019

Full text files

ms_714_dp_19-16_to_secretariat.pdf  Full text

Download statistics

• Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Franklin Amuakwa-Mensah ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:gunefd:2019_016This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:14:35.