EfD Discussion Paper,
Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg

Abstract: Although field experimental methods are the workhorse of researchers interested in risk preferences, practitioners find surveys easier to implement. This paper compares results from experimental versus survey-based methods to elicit farmers’ risk attitudes, in context-free and context-specific decision settings. We then explore how the different survey estimates of risk preferences relate to real-life farming choices in a population of coffee farmers in Costa Rica. Our results indicate that one should be careful when extrapolating risk attitudes across contexts. Contextualized, survey-based estimates of risk preferences do not correlate with general context-free survey estimates, yet context-free survey estimates do predict risk-taking behavior in a context-free risk experiment. Importantly, context-specific survey estimates are associated with risk-taking in the same agricultural real-life context, while context-free survey estimates are not. Practitioners interested primarily in using risk preferences as inputs into policy design should make sure that preferences are elicited in the specific context targeted by the potential policy instrument.

Keywords: risk attitudes; risk elicitation methods; stated preference method; agriculture

JEL-codes: C91; D81

Language: English

33 pages, October 1, 2019

Full text files

ms_719_dp_19-21_final_oct_21.pdf  Full text

Download statistics

• Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Franklin Amuakwa-Mensah ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:gunefd:2019_021This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:14:35.