EfD Discussion Paper,
Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg

Abstract: Resource-conserving technologies are widely reported to benefit both the environment and the people who adopt them. Evidence for these “win-win” claims comes largely from modeling or nonexperimental designs, and mostly from the energy sector. In a randomized trial of water-efficient technologies, the ex-ante engineering estimate of water use reductions was three times higher than the experimental estimate, a divergence arising from engineering and behavioral reasons other than the rebound effect. Using detailed cost information and experimentally elicited time and risk preferences, we infer that the private welfare gains from adoption are, on average, negative, implying no “efficiency paradox.”

Keywords: common pool resource; efficiency gap; field experiment; product adoption puzzle

JEL-codes: D00

Language: English

54 pages, March 16, 2021

Download statistics

• Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Franklin Amuakwa-Mensah ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:gunefd:2021_005This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:14:35.