Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics
EfD Discussion Paper,
Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg
No 24-13: Improving payment for essential services – A field experiment in Nairobi, Kenya
David Fuente (), Josiah Gitu (), Mbutu Mwaura (), Richard Mulwa () and Joseph Cook ()
Additional contact information
David Fuente: School of the Earth, Ocean and Environment, University of South Carolina, 701 Sumter Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
Josiah Gitu: Nairobi City Water and Sewerage Company Ltd, Kampala Road, Nairobi, Kenya
Mbutu Mwaura: Nairobi City Water and Sewerage Company Ltd, Kampala Road, Nairobi, Kenya
Richard Mulwa: Environment for Development-Kenya, Department of Economics and Development Studies, University of Nairobi, Harry Thuku Road, Gandhi Wing Room 309, P.O Box 30197 Nairobi, Kenya
Joseph Cook: School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, 101 Hulbert Hall, PO Box 646210, Pullman WA 99164-6210, USA
Abstract: Utilities across the global require stable revenue streams to provide customers access to high quality energy, water, sanitation, and other essential services. This requires policy makers to set prices to cover costs, promote the efficient use of resources, and ensure services are affordable. It also requires that customers pay their bills. Historically, utilities have used disconnections, or the threat of disconnection, to compel customers to pay their bills on time. However, the increasing recognition of the human rights to water and sanitation by many governments and the COVID-19 pandemic have led some water utilities to discontinue or curtail disconnections. Reducing arrears and encouraging on-time bill payment is essential to get utilities in the Global South on the path to financial sustainability. This raises an important question for scholars and policy makers alike: if disconnection for essential services is viewed as socially or politically unacceptable, how can utilities encourage customers to pay their bills? In partnership with the water utility serving Nairobi, Kenya, we test the impact of a set of simple, low-cost reminders on customer bill payment using a pre-registered, randomized controlled trial of 50,000 residential customers. We use four measures of payment behavior: making any payment, paying the full current month’s bill, total arrears accumulated over the six months when messages were sent, and the fraction of the cumulative 6-month bill paid. We find that SMS-based bill payment reminders were not effective at improving bill payment on average. Nudges alone seem unlikely to solve the problem of water debt.
Keywords: water; sanitation; information provision; field experiment; bill payment; Africa
JEL-codes: C93; D91; O13; Q25; Q56
48 pages, November 22, 2024
Full text files
EfD_DP-24-13%20MS-1888.pdfFull text
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Franklin Amuakwa-Mensah ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:gunefd:2024_013This page generated on 2024-11-25 10:54:36.