Anders Biel, Olof Johansson-Stenman () and Andreas Nilsson
Additional contact information
Anders Biel: Department of Psychology, Postal: Göteborg University, Box 640, SE 40530 GÖTEBORG
Olof Johansson-Stenman: Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law, Göteborg University, Postal: Box 640, SE 40530 GÖTEBORG
Andreas Nilsson: Department of Psychology, Postal: Göteborg University, Box 640, SE 40530 GÖTEBORG
Abstract: While many earlier studies have found that people’s maximum willingness to pay for having a good is often substantially lower than their minimum willingness to accept not having it, more recent experimental evidence suggests that this discrepancy vanishes for standard consumption goods when an incentive-compatible design without misconceptions is used. This paper hypothesises that there is nevertheless a discrepancy for goods with a perceived moral character, such as contributions to a good cause, and moreover that the reason for this discrepancy can largely be explained by differences in emotions and moral perceptions. The results from a real-money dichotomous-choice experiment, combined with measurements of emotions and morality, are consistent with these hypotheses.
Keywords: Willingness to pay-Willingness to accept gap; Endowment effect; Emotions; Ethics; Experiments
26 pages, April 28, 2011
Full text files
25390 HTML file
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Jessica Oscarsson ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0497This page generated on 2024-11-14 18:33:27.