Heather Congdon Fors (heather.congdon.fors@economics.gu.se) and Annika Lindskog (annika.lindskog@economics.gu.se)
Additional contact information
Heather Congdon Fors: Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law, Göteborg University, Postal: P.O. Box 640, SE 40530 GÖTEBORG, Sweden
Annika Lindskog: Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law, Göteborg University, Postal: P.O. Box 640, SE 40530 GÖTEBORG, Sweden
Abstract: We investigate the impact of son preferences in India on gender inequalities in education. We distinguish the impact of preferential treatment of boys from the impact of gender-biased fertility strategies (gender-specific fertility stopping rules and sex-selective abortions). Results show strong impacts of gender-biased fertility strategies on education differences between girls and boys. Preferential treatment of boys has a more limited impact on gender differences. Further, results suggest that gender-biased fertility strategies create gender inequalities in education both because girls and boys end up in systematically different families and because of gender-inequalities in pecuniary investment within families. The extra advantage of the eldest son within the family is small.
Keywords: Son preferences; Gender; Sex-selection; Fertility-stopping rules; Human Capital; Education; Birth order
Language: English
31 pages, First version: October 2019. Revised: October 2021.
Full text files
62249 text file Full text
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Jessica Oscarsson (jessica.oscarsson@economics.gu.se)
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson (sune.karlsson@oru.se).
RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0781This page generated on 2024-11-14 18:33:28.