() and Joel Reneby
Jan Ericsson: McGill University, Postal: Faculty of Management, 1001 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal PQ, Canada H3A 1G5
Joel Reneby: Dept. of Finance, Stockholm School of Economics, Postal: P.O. Box 6501, SE-113 83 Stockholm, Sweden
Abstract: One of the main objections to applying contingent claims analysis outside the area of derivatives pricing, such as to the pricing of corporate (or sovereign) debt, has been that it is not possible to trade in the relevant state variable, e.g. the assets of a firm. Consequently, replicating portfolios can not be formed and preference free pricing does not result. The aim of this paper is to show that assuming traded assets, as is routinely done, is inconsistent with the presence of stocks and bonds. It is also unnecessary. We argue that a superior alternative to obtain a complete markets setting, is to assume that at least one of the firm's securities, e.g. equity, is traded.
8 pages, First version: March 29, 1999. Revised: July 1, 2002. Earlier revisions: February 1, 2002, February 7, 2002, July 1, 2002.
Full text files
hastef0314.pdf Full text
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Helena Lundin ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2018-03-27 10:24:46.