SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance,
Stockholm School of Economics

Abstract: Billions of euros are allocated every year to university research. Increased specialisation and international integration of research and researchers has sharply raised the need for comparisons of performance across fields, institutions and individual researchers. However, there is still no consensus regarding how such rankings should be conducted and what output measures are appropriate to use. We rank all full professors in a particular discipline, economics, in one European nation using seven established, and some of them commonly used, measures of research performance. Our examination shows both that the rank order can vary greatly across measures, and that depending on the measure used the distribution of total research out-put is valued very differently. The renowned KMS measure in economics stands out among the measures analysed here. It exhibits the weakest correlation with the others used in our study. We conclude by giving advice to funding councils and others assessing research quality on how to think about the use of both quantitative and qualitative measures of performance.

Keywords: Impact of research; Ranking; Research productivity; Bibliometrics; Impact Factor

JEL-codes: A11; A14; B41

29 pages, March 4, 2008

Full text files

hastef0693.pdf  Full text

Download statistics

Published as

Magnus Henrekson and Daniel Waldenström, (2011), 'How Should Research Performance Be Measured? A Study of Swedish Economists', The Manchester School, vol 79, no 6, pages 1139-1156

• Stockholm School of Economics
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Helena Lundin ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:hastef:0693This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:15:07.