Sven-Olov Daunfeldt (), Niklas Elert and Dan Johansson ()
Additional contact information
Sven-Olov Daunfeldt: HUI Research, Postal: HUI Research, SE-10329 Stockholm, Sweden and Dalarna University, SE-79188, Falun, Sweden
Niklas Elert: RATIO, Postal: Box 3203, SE-10364 Stockholm, Sweden and Örebro University, SE-70281 Örebro, Sweden
Dan Johansson: HUI Research, Postal: HUI Research, SE-10329 Stockholm, Sweden and Örebro University, SE-70281 Örebro, Sweden
Abstract: It is frequently argued that policymakers should target high-tech firms, i.e., firms with high R&D intensity, because such firms are considered more innovative and therefore potential fast-growers. This argument relies on the assumption that the association among high-tech status, innovativeness and growth is actually positive. We examine this assumption by studying the industry distribution of high-growth firms (HGFs) across all 4-digit NACE industries, using data covering all limited liability firms in Sweden during the period 1997–2008. The results of fractional logit regressions indicate that industries with high R&D intensity can be expected to have a lower share of HGFs than can industries with lower R&D intensity. The findings cast doubt on the wisdom of targeting R&D industries or subsidizing R&D to promote firm growth. In contrast, we find that HGFs are overrepresented in knowledge-intensive service industries, i.e., service industries with a high share of human capital.
Keywords: entrepreneurship; firm growth; gazelles; high-growth firms; high-impact firms; innovation
37 pages, April 22, 2014
Full text files
BinaryLoader.axd?Own....pdf&Attachment=True![]()
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Hans Seerar Westerberg ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:huiwps:0103This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:15:10.