(), Niklas Elert
and Dan Johansson
Sven-Olov Daunfeldt: HUI Research, Postal: HUI Research, SE-10329 Stockholm, Sweden and Dalarna University, SE-79188, Falun, Sweden
Niklas Elert: RATIO, Postal: Box 3203, SE-10364 Stockholm, Sweden and Örebro University, SE-70281 Örebro, Sweden
Dan Johansson: HUI Research, Postal: HUI Research, SE-10329 Stockholm, Sweden and Örebro University, SE-70281 Örebro, Sweden
Abstract: It is frequently argued that policymakers should target high-tech firms, i.e., firms with high R&D intensity, because such firms are considered more innovative and therefore potential fast-growers. This argument relies on the assumption that the association among high-tech status, innovativeness and growth is actually positive. We examine this assumption by studying the industry distribution of high-growth firms (HGFs) across all 4-digit NACE industries, using data covering all limited liability firms in Sweden during the period 1997–2008. The results of fractional logit regressions indicate that industries with high R&D intensity can be expected to have a lower share of HGFs than can industries with lower R&D intensity. The findings cast doubt on the wisdom of targeting R&D industries or subsidizing R&D to promote firm growth. In contrast, we find that HGFs are overrepresented in knowledge-intensive service industries, i.e., service industries with a high share of human capital.
37 pages, April 22, 2014
Full text files
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Helena Nilsson ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2018-02-05 20:50:25.