Monica Costa Dias
, Hidehiko Ichimura
and Gerard J. van den Berg
Monica Costa Dias: Institute for Fiscal Studies
Hidehiko Ichimura: University of Tokyo
Gerard J. van den Berg: Department of Economics, University Amsterdam, Postal: De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Abstract: The matching method for treatment evaluation does not balance selective unobserved differences between treated and non-treated. We derive a simple correction term if there is an instrument that shifts the treatment probability to zero in specific cases. Policies with eligibility restrictions, where treatment is impossible if some variable exceeds a certain value, provide a natural application. In an empirical analysis, we first examine the performance of matching versus regression-discontinuity estimation in the sharp age-discontinuity design of the NDYP job search assistance program for young unemployed in the UK. Next, we exploit the age eligibility restriction in the Swedish Youth Practice subsidized work program for young unemployed, where compliance is imperfect among the young. Adjusting the matching estimator for selectivity changes the results towards inefectiveness of subsidized work in moving individuals into employment.
36 pages, April 21, 2008
Full text files
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Ali Ghooloo ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2018-03-18 13:49:16.