Working Paper Series,
IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy

Abstract: When prioritising among clients, street-level bureaucrats may partly base their decisions on an assessment of the extent to which clients are deserving of help. We examine the impact of two “deservingness cues” on street-level decisions: the extent to which clients seem to need help and the extent to which clients appear to have responsibility for their neediness. The analysis is based on survey experiments with Swedish employment officers. We find that caseworkers devote more working time to jobseekers in greater need, but jobseekers in greater need have no increased likelihood of receiving a training program. In contrast, clients with greater responsibility for their neediness have a lower probability of receiving training, but caseworkers allocate just as much work time to these clients as they do to others. Thus, we confirm that client deservingness is important but qualify this conclusion along two dimensions. First, different cues of deservingness have different impacts for one and the same decision. Se cond, all types of decisions are not affected in the same way

Keywords: Street-level bureaucracy; Client deservingness; Survey experiment; Labor market policy

JEL-codes: H00; J00

Language: English

36 pages, September 14, 2022

Full text files

wp-2022-17-deserving...e-public-sector..pdf  Full text

Download statistics

• IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy
• Ordering Working Papers
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Ali Ghooloo ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:ifauwp:2022_017This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:15:20.