Working Paper Series,
IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy

Abstract: When drawing causal inferences from observational data, researchers often model the propen sity score. To date, the literature on the estimation of propensity scores is vast, and includes covariate selection algorithms as well as super learners and model averaging procedures. The latter often tune the estimated scores to be either very accurate or to provide the best possible result in terms of covariate balance. This paper focuses on using inverse probability weighting to estimate average treatment effects, and makes the assertion that the context requires both accuracy and balance to yield suitable propensity scores. Using Monte Carlo simulation, the paper studies whether frequentist model averaging can be used to simultaneously account for both balance and accuracy in order to reduce the bias of estimated treatment effects. The candidate propensity scores are estimated using reproducing kernel Hilbert space regression, and the simulation results suggest that model averaging does not improve the performance of the individual estimators.

Keywords: .

JEL-codes: C59

Language: English

18 pages, January 30, 2024

Full text files

wp-2024-1-can-model-...reatment-effects.pdf  Full text

Download statistics

• IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy
• Ordering Working Papers
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Ali Ghooloo ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:ifauwp:2024_001This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:15:20.