Seminar Papers,
Stockholm University, Institute for International Economic Studies

Abstract: Government budget balance forces the endogenous use of distortionary tax instruments when an exogenous reform is implemented. The aggregate efficiency of such reforms is based on comparisons of simple summary measures of the Marginal Cost of Funds of the various tariff or quota changes with the Marginal Cost of Funds of the alternative taxes, or of the Marginal Benefit of Government supplied goods. The aggregate efficiency of tariff liberalization is dubious, while quota liberalization is more likely to be efficient. Social welfare rises with aggregate efficiency unless distribution effects are perverse. Plausible sufficient conditions for non-perverse distributional effects are provided. The results frame a diagnostic method for sensitivity analysis in evaluations of trade and tax policies.

Keywords: aggregate efficiency; tariff liberalization; quota liberalization; Social welfare; non-perverse distributional effects

JEL-codes: F13; H21

35 pages, October 31, 1997

Full text files

FULLTEXT01  

Download statistics

Fortchoming as

James E. Anderson, 'Revenue Neutral Trade Reform with Many Households, Quotas and Tariffs', Review of International Economics

• Stockholm University, Institute for International Economic Studies
• Ordering Working Papers
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Hanna Christiansson ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:iiessp:0626This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:15:25.