INDEK Working Paper Series,
Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Industrial Economics and Management

Abstract: Abstract: The aim of this article is to illustrate how the process model for collaborative ventures (Ariño and de la Torre, 1998) and psychological contract theory could function as analytical frameworks for investigations of R&D alliance projects. To empirically illustrate this, we have used as example an analysis of a dyadic R&D alliance, which was close to failure. Findings reveal the following results: (i) that the process model for collaborative ventures is also valid for dyadic R&D alliance projects; (ii) that the concept of psychological contracts presents an alternative perspective when describing collaboration in R&D alliance projects; (iii) that critical incidents is a common denominator in both theoretical approaches; and (iv) that, in contrast to transactional contracts, relational psychological contracts relate to a successful outcome. The managerial implication of the study is that, either manifested as points for contract re-negotiation (process-oriented alliance theory) or as violations (psychological contract theory), critical incidents are vital to manage in order to secure a successful outcome of the alliance.

Keywords: Strategic Alliance; Outsourced R&D; Project Leadership; Qualitative Research

JEL-codes: L24; O15; O32

23 pages, December 16, 2013

Full text files

indekwp3.pdf  

Download statistics

• Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Industrial Economics and Management
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Vardan Hovsepyan ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:kthind:2013_003This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:15:57.