Discussion Papers,
Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science

Abstract: Struggles over the single-seat preferential election method IRV (Instant Runoff Voting) go on in public arenas and scientific journals, with focus on two “anomalies”. “Monotonicity failures” are preference distributions that allow a startling strategic voting called Pushover or its reverse. Analysis shows how a Pushover action works, and why it is hard to predict and exploit an opportunity. While not rare, monotonicity failures should be seen as a minor nuisance. “No-Show paradoxes” are alarms. The IRV tally eliminates a very clear Condorcet winner in a realistic, but somewhat unusual preference structure, too close to Duncan Black’s Single- Peak condition: Too many YXZ-ballots let Z win instead of a very clear Condorcet-winner X who is eliminated; this harms IRV’s legitimacy. Baldwin’s elimination rule when three candidates remain is a suggested remedy. Preference distributions with the same IRV-tally are grouped together and analyzed with “pictograms” as a tool. That allows a generalization of Black’s Single-Peak condition; real cases are close to “Perfect Pie-sharing”, which explains why Condorcet cycles are rare.

Keywords: Instant Runoff Voting; Condorcet methods; Duncan Black’s Single-Peak condition; Baldwin’s elimination rule

JEL-codes: D72

40 pages, June 23, 2020

Full text files

2659146  Full text

Download statistics

• Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science
• Ordering Working Papers
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Stein Fossen ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2020_006This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:16:23.