Guttorm Schjelderup () and Frank Stähler ()
Additional contact information
Guttorm Schjelderup: Dept. of Business and Management Science, Norwegian School of Economics, Postal: NHH , Department of Business and Management Science, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway
Frank Stähler: Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Tübingen, Postal: University of Tübingen, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Mohlstr. 36, D-72074, Tübingen, Germany
Abstract: This paper shows that the OECD inclusive framework of Pillar Two fails to implement the claimed 15% minimum corporate tax for subsidiaries of multinational corporations. The reason is that the Substance-based Income Exclusion of Pillar Two allows to tax-deduct payroll costs and user costs of intangible assets twice from the tax base of the top-up tax. Employing a standard multinational firm model, we show that Pillar Two dampens tax motivated transfer pricing, but changes the employment, investment and import incentives. For a sufficiently large cost share of labor and/or capital, the Substance-based Income Exclusion is equivalent to a production subsidy.
Keywords: Corporate taxation; BEPS; Pillar Two; minimum tax
Language: English
21 pages, First version: March 14, 2023. Revised: March 21, 2023.
Full text files
3058117 Full text
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Stein Fossen ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2023_003This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:16:23.