CLTS Working Papers,
Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies

Abstract: The potential bene ts of providing subsidized inputs to farm-households in developing coun- tries may reach well beyond the targeted households. More speci cally, increased food production and demand for rural labor may bene t poor households through lower food prices and higher rural wages. However, two recent studies of a large input subsidy program in Malawi nd that these e ects are smaller than expected based on anecdotal evidence and previous studies using simulation models. In this paper we provide a potential explanation for this nding by using six farm-household programming models to show how market imperfections limit households' ability to take advantage of cheaper inputs. Our ndings suggest that input subsidy programs could be combined with improved market infrastructure and market access in order to increase non-bene ciary households' bene ts from input subsidies.

Keywords: Input subsidies; Malawi; Farm-household models

JEL-codes: Q12; Q18

35 pages, First version: November 19, 2014. Revised: October 10, 2019.

Full text files

40202  Full text

Download statistics

• Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Sarah Ephrida Tione ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:nlsclt:2014_007This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:16:27.