Maxon Ngochera, Steve Donda, Mafaniso Hara () and Erling Berge ()
Additional contact information
Maxon Ngochera: Senga Bay Fisheries Research Center, Postal: P.O. Box 316, Salima
Steve Donda: Fisheries Department, Postal: P.O. Box 593, Lilongwe
Mafaniso Hara: Institute for poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS), School of Government, Faculty of Economic and Management Science, University of Western Cape,, Postal: Private Bag X17, Bellville 7535, South Africa
Erling Berge: Centre for Land Tenure Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Postal: Centre for Land Tenure Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Aas, Norway
Abstract: The Southeast Arm of Lake Malawi catchment has a wide range of natural resources that require prudent management for sustainability and maximisation of benefits. The current management practice is government sector based, with individual Departments and Ministries using their own policies, legislations and management approaches, yet dealing with the same composite resource and user communities. This has resulted in fragmentation of management leading to the lack of alignment between formal and informal institutions, and competition for power and authority for management. Fragmentation is also leading to loss of resource rent. This paper analyses how and why management is fragmented in the Southeast Arm of Lake Malawi catchment and suggests how management could be defragmented, with special interest on fisheries. Activities with high negative impacts on fisheries include: overfishing; soil erosion resulting in siltation and turbidity of the lake; chemical and organic pollution; loss of access to land and beaches; and habitat loss. There is need for a better and more holistic understanding of how human activities represent both livelihood benefits and a threat to sustainability of natural resources in order to find ways for balancing these two aspects. We suggest that to increase the efficacy of management of Lake Malawi’s Southeast Arm will require ‘defragmented decentralization’, an approach whereby devolution of authority and responsibility are ceded to the district and local levels, respectively.
Keywords: Management; institutions; fragmentation; defragmented decentralisation; devolution; Lake Malawi
18 pages, First version: October 16, 2017. Revised: October 21, 2019.
Full text files
40491 Full text
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Sarah Ephrida Tione ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:nlsclt:2017_012This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:16:27.