Gøril Louise Andreassen () and Knut Einar Rosendahl ()
Additional contact information
Gøril Louise Andreassen: School of Economics and Business, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Postal: Norwegian University of Life Sciences, School of Economics and Business, P.O. Box 5003 NMBU, N-1432 Ås, Norway
Knut Einar Rosendahl: School of Economics and Business, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Postal: Norwegian University of Life Sciences, School of Economics and Business, P.O. Box 5003 NMBU, N-1432 Ås, Norway
Abstract: What factors determine whether it is optimal with one or more technologies in a decarbonized road transport sector, and what policies should governments choose? We investigate these questions theoretically and numerically through a static, partial equilibrium model for the road transport market. We find that two important factors that determine whether it will be and whether it should be one or more technologies are how close substitutes the two vehicle technologies are and the number of vehicles of the other technology. Our numerical results indicate that with two incompatible networks, two differentiated goods are optimal compared to only one if they are not too close substitutes. The first-best policy is a subsidy of the markup on charging and filling, where the markup is higher the higher the increased utility of more stations. In addition, to avoid an unwanted lock-in, a temporary stimulus may be needed to reach the stable equilibrium.
Keywords: Indirect network effects; Decarbonization; Climate policy; Electric vehicles; Hydrogen vehicles
38 pages, March 25, 2020
Full text files
43315 Full text
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Frode Alfnes ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:nlsseb:2020_003This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:16:28.