Heike Hennig-Schmidt (), Hendrik Jürges and Daniel Wiesen
Additional contact information
Heike Hennig-Schmidt: Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Postal: HERO / Department of Health Management and Health Economics, P.O. Box 1089 Blindern, NO-0317 Oslo, Norway
Hendrik Jürges: Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, Postal: Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, Germany
Daniel Wiesen: Department of Business Administration and Health Care Management, Postal: Department of Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Cologne
Abstract: We introduce a controlled behavioral experiment framed in a neonatal care context to analyze the effect of introducing a random audit and fines on individuals' honesty in a simple reporting task. Our behavioral data provide new evidence on dishonesty and upcoding in health care. We find that introducing audits combined with a fine significantly reduces dishonesty on aggregate. The effect is driven by a significant reduction in upcoding. At the same time, dishonest choices that cannot be detected as fraudulent by an audit (partial dishonesty) increase. We also find evidence that individual characteristics such as gender, medical background, and integrity are related to dishonest behavior.
Keywords: Dishonesty; audits and fines; neonatology; medically framed experiment; reporting of birth weights
34 pages, April 4, 2018
Full text files
2018-3.pdf Full text
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Kristi Brinkmann Lenander ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:oslohe:2018_003This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:16:49.