Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics
Working Paper Series,
Sveriges Riksbank (Central Bank of Sweden)
No 397: Econometric issues with Laubach and Williams’ estimates of the natural rate of interest
Daniel Buncic ()
Additional contact information
Daniel Buncic: Stockholm Business School, Stockholm University, Postal: SE-103 37, Stockholm, Sweden
Abstract: Holston, Laubach and Williams’ (2017) estimates of the natural rate of interest are driven by the downward trending behaviour of ‘other factor’ z(t). I show that their implementation of Stock and Watson’s (1998) Median Unbiased Estimation (MUE) to determine the size of parameter λ(z) which drives this downward trend in z(t) is unsound. It cannot recover the ratio of interest λ(z) = a_r*σ(z)/σ(˜y) from MUE because of an ‘unnecessary’ misspecification in Holston et al.’s (2017) Stage 2 model. Moreover, their implementation of MUE on this ‘unnecessarily’ misspecified Stage 2 model spuriously amplifies the point estimate of λ(z). Using a simulation experiment, I show that their procedure generates excessively large estimates of λ(z) when applied to data generated from a model where the true λ(z) is zero. Correcting the misspecification in their Stage 2 model and the implementation of MUE leads to a substantially smaller (and highly insignificant) λ(z) point estimate, and thereby a more subdued downward trend in ‘other factor’ z(t) and the natural rate. The paper also discusses various other issues with Holston et al.’s (2017) model of the natural rate that make it unsuitable for policy analysis.
Keywords: Natural rate of interest; Median Unbiased Estimation; Kalman Filter; spurious relations; misspecified econometric models
113 pages, November 1, 2020
Full text files
no.-397-econometric-...rate-of-interest.pdfFull text
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Lena Löfgren ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:rbnkwp:0397This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:16:58.