Dorte Gyrd-Hansen: COHERE, Postal: Department of Business and Economics & Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark
Abstract: Researchers have in recent years sought to establish whether the general public value treatment at the end-of-life (EOL) more highly than other treatments. Results are mixed, with social preferences most often exhibiting lack of preferences for EOL treatments. This nul-result may be driven by the often applied study design, where respondents are to choose between treatments targeting patients with varying fixed life-expectancies. When remaining life is certain and salient, a rule-of-rescue sentiment may drive preferences across all scenarios. This study presents a different design, where the comparator is a preventive intervention. We study preferences from both an individual and social perspective, and find no preference for an EOL premium when age is held constant. We test the interaction between age and EOL treatment, and finder stronger preferences when patients face premature death.
9 pages, January 16, 2017
Full text files
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Terkel Christiansen ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2018-04-30 14:57:26.