Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics
SIFR Research Report Series,
Institute for Financial Research
No 26: The Evolution of Security Designs
Thomas H. Noe (), Michael J. Rebello and Jun Wang ()
Additional contact information
Thomas H. Noe: A.B. Freeman School of Business, Postal: Tulane University, St. Charles Ave., New Orleans, LA 70118, USA
Michael J. Rebello: A.B. Freeman School of Business, Postal: Tulane University, St. Charles Ave., New Orleans, LA 70118, USA
Jun Wang: Baruch College, Postal: One Bernard Baruch Way, Box B10-225, New York, NY 10010, USA
Abstract: This paper embeds security design in a model of evolutionary learning. We consider a competitive and perfect financial market where agents, as in Allen and Gale (1988), have heterogeneous valuations for cash flows. Our point of departure is that, instead of assuming that agents are endowed with rational expectations, we model their behavior as the product of adaptive learning. Our results demonstrate that adaptive learning profoundly affects security design. Securities are mispriced even in the long run and optional designs trade off underpricing against intrinsic value maximization. The evolutionary dominant security design calls for issuing securities that engender large losses with a small but positive probability, and otherwise produce stable payoffs. These designs are almost the exact opposite of the pure state claims which are optimal in the rational expectations framework but are roughly consistent with what one would expect given the decision making heuristics documented in the behavioural economics literature.
Keywords: Corporate financing; Adaptive learning; Genetic algorithm; Security choice
36 pages, September 15, 2004
Full text files
sifr-wp26.pdf
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Anki Helmer ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2024-02-05 17:13:34.