(), Fredrik Heyman
, Mattias Nilsson
, Helena Svaleryd
and Jonas Vlachos
Henrik Cronqvist: The Ohio State University
Fredrik Heyman: Research Institute of Industrial Economies
Mattias Nilsson: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Helena Svaleryd: Research Institute of Industrial Economies
Jonas Vlachos: SITE, Stockholm School of Economcs, and CEPR
Abstract: We present evidence on whether managerial entrenchment affects workers' pay, using a large panel dataset that matches public firms with detailed data on their subsidiaries and workers. We find that CEOs with a stronger grip on control pay their workers higher wages, but CEO ownership of cash flow rights mitigates such behavior. Unionized workers and executives are found to get a larger share of the higher pay. These findings do not seem to be driven by productivity differences or reverse causality, and are robust to a series of robustness checks. Our evidence is consistent with an agency model in which entrenched managers pay higher wages because they come with direct private benefits for the manager, such as lower-effort wage bargaining and better CEO-employee relations, and suggests more broadly an important link between the corporate governance of large public firms and labor market outcomes.
47 pages, September 15, 2006
Full text files
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Anki Helmer ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2018-01-23 23:37:49.