SIFR Research Report Series,
Institute for Financial Research

Abstract: This paper gives a new answer to the challenging question raised by Glosten (1994): "Is the electronic order book inevitable?". While the order book enables traders to compete to supply anonymous liquidity, the specialist system enables one to reap the benefits from repeated interaction. We compare a competitive limit order book and a limit order book with a specialist, like the NYSE. Thanks to non-anonymous interaction, mediated by brokers, uninformed investors can obtain good liquidity from the specialist. This, however, creates an adverse selection problem on the limit order book. Market liquidity and social welfare are improved by the specialist if adverse selection is severe and if brokers have long horizon, so that reputation becomes a matter of concern for them. In contrast, if asymmetric information is limited, spreads are wider and utilitarian welfare is lower when the specialist competes with the limit order book than in a pure limit order book market.

Keywords: Limit order book; specialist; hybrid market

JEL-codes: D82; G10; G24

35 pages, July 15, 2007

Full text files

sifr-wp55.pdf  

Download statistics

• Institute for Financial Research
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Anki Helmer ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:sifrwp:0055This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:17:04.