Stella Canessa (), Gordon Dahl (), Anna Hasselqvist (), Costas Meghir (), Susan Niknami (), Mårten Palme (), Helmut Rainer (), Olof Rosenqvist () and Pengpeng Xiao ()
Additional contact information
Stella Canessa: LMU Munich
Gordon Dahl: UC San Diego
Anna Hasselqvist: DIW Berlin
Costas Meghir: Yale University
Susan Niknami: Swedish Institute for Social Research
Mårten Palme: Stockholm University
Helmut Rainer: LMU Munich
Olof Rosenqvist: IFAU Uppsala University
Pengpeng Xiao: Duke University
Abstract: Divorce reshapes family life, yet little is known about one of its most consequential features: the allocation of child custody. We study the impact of joint versus sole custody on both parents and children using rich administrative data from Sweden linked to over 25 years of newly-collected court custody rulings. To address selection concerns, we exploit random assignment of custody disputes to judges who differ sharply in their propensity to grant joint custody. For fathers, joint custody substantially raises earnings and improves mental health, consistent with sustained paternal involvement enhancing labor market attachment and psychological well-being. In contrast, there are no measurable labor market or mental health effects for mothers. Turning to children, joint custody increases standardized test scores and school quality without affecting mental health outcomes. Joint custody increases fathers’ chances of remarriage, keeps separated parents in closer geographic proximity, and has no effect on intimate partner violence allegations against either partner. These findings inform longstanding debates over the role of child custody in shaping post-divorce family life.
Keywords: Child custody; divorce
Language: English
76 pages, July 27, 2026
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Chloe Nibourel ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:sofile:2026_011This page generated on 2026-07-27 12:50:37.