Bard Misund, Petter Osmundsen () and Marius Sikveland
Additional contact information
Bard Misund: UiS, Postal: University of Stavanger, NO-4036 Stavanger, Norway
Petter Osmundsen: UiS, Postal: University of Stavanger, NO-4036 Stavanger, Norway
Marius Sikveland: UiS, Postal: University of Stavanger, NO-4036 Stavanger, Norway
Abstract: This paper studies financial statement information from the 50 largest international oil and gas companies during 1992 to 2011 and evaluates their relation to market values. In particular, we examine how this relationship is affected by accounting method choice (successful efforts versus full cost accounting) and vertical integration. We find that net income is more value relevant for full cost companies compared to companies that use the successful efforts accounting method. Furthermore, the value relevance of oil and gas reserves is different among successful efforts and full cost companies. Larger reserves among successful efforts companies are awarded a premium by stock markets. The value relevance of book value is significantly lower for integrated companies than for pure upstream companies. We also find that the value relevance of oil and gas reserves is different for upstream and integrated companies.
Keywords: Company Valuation; Value-relevance; Financial Analysis; Oil and Gas Industry
13 pages, October 9, 2014
Full text files
uis_wps_2014_18_misund_osmundsen_sikveland.pdf
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Bernt Arne Odegaard ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:stavef:2014_018This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:17:13.