UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance,
University of Stavanger

Abstract: The Basel Committee’s minimum capital requirement function for banks’ credit risk is based on value at risk. This paper performs a statistical and economic analysis of the consequences of instead basing it on expected shortfall, a switch that has already been set in motion for market risk. The empirical analysis is carried out by means of both theoretical simulations and real data from a Norwegian savings bank group’s corporate portfolio. Expected shortfall has some well known conceptual advantages compared to value at risk, primarily a better ability to capture tail risk. It is also sub-additive in gen- eral, thus always reflecting the positive effect of diversification. These two aspects are examined in detail, in addition to comparing parameter sensitivity, estimation stabil- ity and backtesting methods for the two risk measures. All comparisons are conducted within the Basel Committee’s minimum capital requirement framework. The findings support a switch from value at risk to expected shortfall for credit risk modelling.

Keywords: Expected shortfall; credit risk; bank regulation; Basel III; tail risk

JEL-codes: G10

30 pages, March 30, 2017

Full text files

uis_wps_2017_04_osmundsen.pdf  

Download statistics

• University of Stavanger
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Bernt Arne Odegaard ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:stavef:2017_004This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:17:13.