Massimiliano Marzo () and Paolo Zagaglia
Additional contact information
Massimiliano Marzo: Universita di Bologna, Postal: Department of Economics, Universita di Bologna, Strada Maggiore, 45 Bologna, Italy
Paolo Zagaglia: Dept. of Economics, Stockholm University, Postal: Department of Economics, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. Research Unit, Bank of Finland, Finland
Abstract: Canzoneri and Diba (2004) show that the Taylor principle is not a panacea for equilibrium determinacy in a model where bonds and money provide liquidity services to households. We consider a cashless variant of their model with two types of government bonds. One bond provides transaction services, whereas the other is used only as a store of value. We show that the Taylor principle is still sacrosant. In general, the results of Leeper (1991) are confirmed.
Keywords: Monetary Policy; Fiscal Policy; Government Bonds; Determinacy
28 pages, August 11, 2008
Full text files
wp08_07.pdf
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Anne Jensen ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2024-02-05 17:13:48.