() and Paolo Zagaglia
Massimiliano Marzo: Universita di Bologna, Postal: Department of Economics, Universita di Bologna, Strada Maggiore, 45 Bologna, Italy
Paolo Zagaglia: Dept. of Economics, Stockholm University, Postal: Department of Economics, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. Research Unit, Bank of Finland, Finland
Abstract: Canzoneri and Diba (2004) show that the Taylor principle is not a panacea for equilibrium determinacy in a model where bonds and money provide liquidity services to households. We consider a cashless variant of their model with two types of government bonds. One bond provides transaction services, whereas the other is used only as a store of value. We show that the Taylor principle is still sacrosant. In general, the results of Leeper (1991) are confirmed.
28 pages, August 11, 2008
Full text files
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Sten Nyberg ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2018-01-23 23:38:24.