Massimiliano Marzo () and Paolo Zagaglia
Additional contact information
Massimiliano Marzo: Universita di Bologna, Postal: Department of Economics, Universita di Bologna, Strada Maggiore, 45 Bologna, Italy
Paolo Zagaglia: Dept. of Economics, Stockholm University, Postal: Department of Economics, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. Research Unit, Bank of Finland, Finland
Abstract: Canzoneri and Diba (2004) show that the Taylor principle is not a panacea for equilibrium determinacy in a model where bonds and money provide liquidity services to households. We consider a cashless variant of their model with two types of government bonds. One bond provides transaction services, whereas the other is used only as a store of value. We show that the Taylor principle is still sacrosant. In general, the results of Leeper (1991) are confirmed.
Keywords: Monetary Policy; Fiscal Policy; Government Bonds; Determinacy
28 pages, August 11, 2008
Full text files
wp08_07.pdf
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Anne Jensen ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:sunrpe:2008_0007This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:17:18.