Umeå Economic Studies,
Umeå University, Department of Economics

Abstract: We propose an extension of the often used rational addiction model. Our model includes both legal and illegal cigarettes. The model is tested on a Swedish data set covering the aggregate legal and illegal cigarette markets. When we treat legal and illegal cigarettes as independent demand equations, we find no addiction, but rationality for legal cigarettes, and rational addiction for illegal cigarettes. Since the demand for legal and illegal cigarettes is probably best considered as simultaneously determined, we have also estimated a "semi-reduced" system. Legal cigarettes are negatively related to their price while illegal cigarettes are positively related to the legal price. This indicates that, as expected, the drawback of excise duty on legal cigarettes is that more agents are attracted into the illegal cigarette market. When testing the hypothesis of a common habit stock for legal and illegal cigarettes, the results are mixed. It cannot be ruled out that legal and illegal cigarettes accumulate two separate habit stocks. The proposed model is applicable to any situation with two a addictive consumption goods.

Keywords: Bootlegging; Demand Habits; Rational Addiction; Taxation

JEL-codes: D11; D12

31 pages, November 28, 2000

Full text files

DownloadAsset.action...Id=3&assetKey=ues543  

Download statistics

• Umeå University, Department of Economics
• Ordering Working Papers
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to David Skog ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:umnees:0543This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:17:25.