Erik Geijer (), Göran Bostedt () and Runar Brännlund ()
Additional contact information
Erik Geijer: Dept of Forest Economics, Postal: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-901 83 Umeå, Sweden
Göran Bostedt: Dept of Forest Economics, Postal: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-901 83 Umeå, Sweden
Runar Brännlund: Department of Economics, Umeå University, Postal: S 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
Abstract: The main objective of this paper is to analyze the potential goal conflict between two of Sweden’s environmental objectives: Sustainable Forests and Reduced Climate Impact – or, more precisely, the conflict between forest conservation and the supply of wood fuel. To accomplish this, we use a forest sector model that includes the suppliers and major users of roundwood. The econometric results, based on a data set that spans 40 years, show that all the own price elasticities have the expected signs. Among the three forestry products, the supply and (long-term) demand of forest fuel seems to be most sensitive to a price change. In a second step, the estimated model is used to simulate the effect of increased forest conservation -- the Sustainable Forest objective -- on the supply of wood fuel. If oil is used as a substitute, Swedish emissions of greenhouse gases will increase by almost 0.92 percent, which indicates a clear conflict with the Reduced Climate Impact objective.
Keywords: Goal conflict; Wood fuels; Forest sector model; Roundwood markets; Forest conservation
27 pages, November 27, 2009
Full text files
DownloadAsset.action...Id=3&assetKey=ues794
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to David Skog ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2024-02-05 17:13:51.