and Henry Ohlsson
John Laitner: University of Michigan, Postal: Department of Economics, Lorch Hall, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1220, USA, ,
Henry Ohlsson: Department of Economics, Postal: Department of Economics, Uppsala University, P.O. Box 513, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden
Abstract: This paper reviews four well--known theoretical models of private bequest behavior, notes their differing implications for public policy, and discusses a way of empirically discriminating among them. Then it implements the test with micro data from Sweden (LLS) and the U.S. (PSID). The so-called altruistic (or dynastic) model, which, among the four models, has perhaps the most wide-ranging implications for policy, receives some, though limited, support in the LLS, but not the PSID. The inter-country difference is statistically significant. There is evidence of a potential complication due to a dependence of children's education on parents financial status in the case of the U.S.
32 pages, July 15, 1998
Full text files
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Lovisa Isaksson ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2019-01-15 07:35:11.